View on Obama's presidency; in a letter
E. Ablorh-Odjidja,
Ghanadot
September 16, 2014
To President Obama:
I have not written anything
disparaging about you, since my ebullient and
adoring articles during the heady days of your first
presidential campaign in 2008.
Then came your premature
acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize, and I went
silent.
I thought the acceptance was too hurried and that it
meant too much hubris on your part. And the manner
with which it was so horridly offered felt like a
bribe - a pacification.
I also thought of others of
the black race who had received the same award
before you, after real substantive contributions to
mankind and I thought yours may have cheapened the
prize.
I had tentative thoughts
about the Peace Prize as a good reward for world
citizens of peaceful coexistence inclinations.
You could have been one of the deserving.
But the offer, barely months into your first
term as the first Black American President, was a
shocker.
The Prize, as I thought, was
a trap to emasculate your administration. The pure
expectation of peace implied has now begotten
inactions and indecisions on the part of your
administration.
Not wanting to stray into the
negative about you and your administration, I
resisted telling you this earlier.
But six years into your
presidency, something else is happening that may be
more precious to me than the Peace award:
the template for Black presidencies to come
after you is being set, molded, and tested by the
same white power structure that has for centuries
controlled us.
It looks like the prospect of
more assertive Black presidents is growing doubtful.
You were elected for two
reasons:
To heal the racial divide and to be a post-war
president.
But these, we had hoped, would be achieved
with minimal expense on Black legacy and aspirations.
Unfortunately, the legacy
part is being tested and used by others; as a shield
in the pursuit of ideological policies that have no
direct benefits for us as Black people. But the
proponents care less about how these
policies may rather hurt us.
You are the leader of all of
America, the world’s only superpower.
But the world sees you more as a weakened
president because you are the first Black American
president.
And listening to what the media is now saying
about your presidency adds to the current confusion
in the state of your foreign affairs.
Mark Styne, author, and
conservative columnist writes you were elected to be
the “Clement Attlee to Bush's Winston Churchill… in
(your) case the enemy did not accept that the war
was over. “
He concludes that it takes
two (the enemy and you) to tango, except your
principal move has been “to stand at the side of the
floor looking cool.”
Mr. President, the imagery
above is not nice.
The Black culture invented
the word “cool,” as a jazz idiom, to convey
effectively, effervescing, fashionable, and
affirmative energizing force in our acts.
But this reference to the “cool,” as used in
Stein's piece, conjures up different imagery.
It means you are idle, to put it kindly.
Some whites thought they were
doing us a favor and being “cool” when they voted
for you – a feel-good preposition that some may now be
questioning.
Behind the thumbs up, I am
certain, was the snickering: No achievement of note,
but have it anyway.
Just be anti-Bush and the world would love
us.
The notion of a dormant
America spread around the world would be useful for
various reasons and purposes, including those that
have antithetical views to America’s interest, but
have no peaceful alternatives to its power.
The sentiment that supported
and cheered your novel presidency needs to be
questioned.
Was it anti-Bush or anti-America?
And are you certain that this
professed support is pro-Black and against racism as
if racism is only confined to the United States of
America?
My lowly office at home
suggests that the sentiment was anti-American, Bush
being a convenient factor.
Sometimes, America is its own
worst enemy at home.
Locked in partisan combats here, it fails to
see that part of the world that is superpower
envious, that may want to play us for its own
benefit.
As the world’s foremost
practitioner of capitalism and most likely the
richest, America is deemed to have too much power,
too much consumption of global resources, and to top
it all, it has also so much cultural dominance over
the rest of the world.
As evidence, it is the
world’s most preferred destination country for
immigration.
Even immigrants already here, who rail
against America daily, are reluctant to go back to
their native lands. Or, migrate to some European
countries where banana peels are still thrown at
African soccer players!
Sure, there is still racism.
The slavery blemish cannot be forgotten.
But in comparison, America has still the
first Black leader, the real leader of a modern
superpower world.
A Black man in a position of envy is a magnet
for influence as well as a vulnerable fulcrum that
latent racism can seek to use to manipulate
America’s power.
Mr. President, my peak regret
is you are in that vulnerable position now.
Some of your liberal
supporters have issues that have nothing to do with
blackness.
They want these solved.
Your being black may be instinctively useful
to them.
But they are not helping much with your current
situation.
Some of these folks may be behind the push
for your acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize.
These folks are not paying
attention to the larger persona of your presidency,
which happens to be your legacy.
The Peace Prize may end up producing optics
that may later bug your legacy.
Your recent 9/11 memorial
speech, staged in prime time with a background
drapery that gave the impression of two horns
protruding from the sides of your head, could have
been avoided, or was it deliberate?
Same Mark Styne picks up
another instance of your wrong optics in one of his
columns:
“And so, it was that Barack
Obama observed the anniversary of 9/11 by visiting
something called Ka-BOOM! a non-profit that helps
build playgrounds for children. Neither the
President nor the First Lady nor anyone else in the
40-car motorcade appears to have thought it odd
that, on the day the Twin Towers went Ka-BOOM!,
America's Commander-in-Chief should be helping put
children's toys in backpacks marked Ka-BOOM!”
Remember Bush in front of
kids in a classroom on day 9/11?
Just sitting there in painful
silence didn’t help Bush.
Neither was his tortured demeanor enough to
depict the tragedy of the occasion for his
detractors.
Instead, the occasion was used as a cue for
the media to mock him. And now Obama promotes Ka-Boom,
in front of kids on the anniversary date of 9/11?
Your mostly liberal-leaning
friends in the media are not helping either.
This is not good.
They call you “Obama the
reluctant warrior” and deliberately compare you to
Moses.
Watch out.
The metaphor of Moses may conceal a slight,
even as it sounds incoherent.
But the irony is hidden in the comparison
with Moses, sir.
In your case, you sought the
presidency twice.
You were at your best at ambition; whereas
poor Moses had the role of a leader entrusted on
him.
As you focus on seeking some
accommodations in the Middle East, you should listen
to comments from some Middle East types.
They give me no hope.
To think of the acquiescence you have
granted to this part of the world, yet leaders from
the Middle East are still not showing you any
deference should make you worry!
“There is a disinclination
to believe his promises, said Mustafa Alani of the
Gulf Research Center in Dubai” to the Washington
Post.
"We have reached a low point
of trust in this administration," he says. "We think
in a time of crisis Mr. Obama will walk away from
everyone if it means saving his own skin."
And don’t expect much from
the conservative press in America, they are your
opponents, at least on ideological grounds.
Michael Gordon of the New
York Post writes in his column “(Obama’s) worldview,
his politics, his prejudices, his habits — they’ve
been a mismatch for the country and its needs. He
has been a dud even in the one area where he seemed
a lock to make things better, racial relations.”
But here comes a shot at you
from the liberal side, your friends, too:
Maureen Dowd, a liberal
columnist at New York Times says, “The one thing it
was impossible to imagine, back in the giddy days of
the 2009 inauguration, as Americans basked in their
open-mindedness and pluralism, was that the first
African-American president would outsource race.”
Indeed, you have been a
useful “open-minded” president, except when it came
to the subject of race in Ferguson, Missouri, where
Michael Brown, an unarmed 18-year-old Black was shot
by a white police officer, then you became the first
American president to “outsource race.”
Now Maureen Dowd accuses you
of having “deputized Al Sharpton” to raise protest
marches in Ferguson, thereby detaching yourself “at
the very moment” when you could have made a
difference on the issue of race relations!
Had a conservative written
what Maureen Dowd did, he or she would have been
called a racist.
In my case, if I did, the name Uncle Tom
would have sufficed!
There is huge problem brewing
for you in the media.
And you need to correct this fast before you
leave office.
Whatever has happened and continues to happen
that is negative before you leave office, including
the perception of a weaker America, racial animus
will put the entire blame on the first Black
presidency.
It is time to pivot – to do
something different.
We are six years into the
first time a Black man held such phenomenal
political power in the modern world. The Nobel Prize
winner label hasn’t worked.
The anti-Bush sentiment that you continue to
harp on hasn’t done much to burnish your reputation.
My advice, tell the world you
wanted so badly to be the peacemaker after the Nobel
Peace Prize award, but the world wouldn’t let you.
And be ready to defend America’s interest first -
vigorously.
E. Ablorh-Odjidja,
Publisher www.ghanadot.com, Washington, DC,
September 16, 2014
Permission to publish:
Please feel free to publish or reproduce, with
credits, unedited. If posted on a website, email a
copy of the web page to publisher@ghanadot.com. Or
don't publish at all.
|