|
J.H. Mensah
and Owning the African Renaissance
By Kofi Akosah-Sarpong, Ghanadot
Mr. J. H. Mensah, 78, is Ghanaian President John
Kufour’s economic development czar. He is simultaneously
a nationalist, an Africanist, and a globalist. Added to
these are his attributes as top policy-maker,
bureaucrat, politician, economist, and consultant across
the Ghanaian, African and global development scene. Over
the years, Mr. Mensah’s innate awakening has come about
by battling imperialism, take-on brutal military juntas,
exiled for his believes in the democratic process, and
locked horns with multi-lateral institutions like the
World Bank over policies he thinks are
counter-productive to Africa.
That’s why Mr. Mensah says that, “Africa must own fully
her renaissance.” This underpins Mr. Mensah’s years of
observations, despair and relief, failures and
successes, and vast experiences on the Ghanaian and
African situation. It is from such background that Mr.
Mensah calls ”for Africa and her leaders to own the
African Renaissance before they can hope to realize any
dividends from it” (July 27, Ghanadot/GNA). He is not
only talking from many an exaggerated visions and
unrealistic propaganda of yesteryears, but from
practical experiences and wisdom.
What is African Renaissance? It is African cultural
rebirth or African cultural awakening. And why the
cultural rebirth or awakening? As Mr. Mensah noted, from
the Europeans to the Asians to the Latinos, their
renaissance was born out of the fact that there were too
much inhibitions within their norms and values that was
stifling their progress and have to be awakened and
refined, and at the same time use fully the good parts
for progress. The attempts are to refine certain
cultural inhibitions are universal as societies attempt
to develop: the Europe of the “Dark Ages” had all these
strange values and erroneous thinking. But European
elites, through the Enlightenment thinkers and writers
of the 17th and 18th centuries such as Galileo Galilei,
Michel de Montaigne, René Descartes, Voltaire,
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Locke and David Hume,
summoned the intellectual will to overturned such
inhibiting values by campaigning that human reason could
be used to fight ignorance, deadly superstitions,
tyranny, and to build a better world.
More critically, the European, Asian and Latino
renaissances emanated from the schisms within their
respective values and traditions and not imposed. It was
not also a mass thing. Few of their elites, who thought
they were enlightened enough, waged sustained campaigns
from almost all spheres, sometimes at the risk of their
lives, to refine the cultural inhibitions that were
blocking their societies’ progress. Such need to awaken
the African culture for progress has dawned because
either the extremely long-running colonial rule, which
profoundly suppressed African values for developmental
metamorphosis or post-independence African elites’ weak
grasp of Africa’s values in its progress, certain parts
of Africa’s values deemed negative have not seen
conscious attempts to refine them from within African
values for its greater progress.
Nowhere do we see this more than the exclusion of
African values and traditions in not only
policy-makings, bureaucratizing, and consultancies but
also intellectualizing, thinking and philosophizing
about Africa’s progress. The European, Asian and Latino
renaissances that Mr. Mensah is talking about first
emanated heavily from within their innate values and
traditions before appropriating from other cultural
values. This is where their confidences and faith grew
from. The lack of these innate mechanisms has affected
Africa’s confidence and faith in its progress. No doubt,
Mr. Mensah “blamed the state of African economies on
lack of faith and confidence of African leaders in
themselves, and in their peoples to initiate and manage
the necessary change needed to lift African states from
the doldrums of poverty into globally competitive
economies.”
Post-independent African leaders such as Ghana’s Kwame
Nkrumah and his associates not only failed to
appropriate African values and traditions in deeper
policy-makings, bureaucratizing, and consultancies, and
in this consideration, also intellectualize, think and
philosophize about Africa’s progress, but blamed almost
everything on the “imperialists,” that’s the
ex-colonialists. This blinded Nkrumah and his associates
not to examine critically their very values and
traditions for the higher progress of Africa. If today,
a large of number Africans blames certain challenges of
their lives on witchcraft, it is because of that. This
weakened the very African values and traditions that
were to be used as platform to launch Africa’s progress
– as all renaissances have done. No doubt, with
confidence and faith in their very values weakened many
an African thought he or she has no value and that all
values for progress come from the Western world – hence
the heavy sway of Western values driving Africa’s
education system.
In awakening African values for progress, the central
issue is not only appropriating African values and
traditions in policy-makings, bureaucratizing, and
consultancies, and in this sense, also intellectualize,
think and philosophize about Africa’s progress, but how
the enlightened African thinkers and writers could be
able to cut-and-paste pretty much of the global
development values, as some globalization experts argue,
to not only refine Africa’s inhibiting values but also
add to Africa’s already good values for progress. In
this context, the enlightened African thinkers and
writers, who are expected to drive the African
Renaissance process, are expected to be simultaneously
magicians and alchemists in the global development
system. In designing and owning the African Renaissance
process, African thinkers, writers, policy-makers,
bureaucrats, and consultants are not only to juggle
simultaneously African values and traditions with the
dominant neo-liberal ones but also mix them where
appropriate.
So African elites, as Mr. Mensah argues, have “to tap”
into “the existing support from the international
community, especially funds in the private sector, to
enable the continent to reach middle-income levels
within set times.” The reason is that for both
historical and material realities, Africa finds itself
in a funny position, in the progress scheme of things,
and needs remarkably brilliant policy-makings,
bureaucratizing, and consultancies, drawn from its
values and traditions, to deal with an international
community that’s unfair to it. Mr. Mensah is aware of
this dilemma and advises that “as things were now, too
many of the decisions that could make or break the
African Renaissance were unfortunately within the power
of the development partners.” And its here that African
policy-makers, bureaucrats, and consultants could
intellectualize, think and philosophize about Africa’s
progress by cutting-and-pasting from the global
development values in relation to Africa’s values and
traditions for the sustainable operations of the
emerging African Renaissance process.
Kofi Akosah-Sarpong,
Canada, July 31, 2007
|