|
Tsikata, Rule of Law, and
Democracy
By Kofi Akosah-Sarpong
The rejection of national honour for his contribution to
the growth of Ghana’s security by Kojo Tsikata, fondly
called Kojo-T, a retired military captain and former
National Security Adviser in both the military and
civilian regimes of Jerry Rawlings’ Provisional National
Defence Congress (PNDC) and National Democratic Congress
(NDC), reveals the struggles of Ghana’s nascent
democracy.
The Kojo-T rejection (of the National Order of the Volta
– Companion Category) is based on his feverish complains
that his cousin, Tsatsu Tsikata, former CEO of the
state-owned Ghana National Petroleum Corporation, has
been jailed 5 years for financial crimes to the state.
For almost 6 years, Tsatsu, spoken of privately as a
gambler, trial has been going on, testing Ghana’s
16-year-old nascent democratic dispensation, of which
the rule of law, for long trodden upon especially under
the almost 20-year regimes of Rawlings-Kojo-T, is a tall
part.
As much as Ghana’s long efforts for democracy and rule
of law go, Kojo-T, almost 70 years old, has been a
complicated figure, practically projecting disbelief in
democracy/rule of law and giant belief in some sort of a
dictatorial Marxist-Socialist Ghana. In some of sort of
strange ways, Kojo-T has come to embody the dark
recesses of Ghana’s culture – some superstitious
Ghanaians believe Kojo-T has occult powers and is
heavily mired in juju-marabout rituals to the extent
that he can vanish into thin air or transform himself
into any animal. This is not good for democratic growth
and rule of law in a Ghana part of which culture, as
Kojo-T is alleged to exemplify, have been inhibiting its
progress.
For a good part of Ghana’s existence Kojo-T has been
implicated in one coup detat or another. As National
Security Adviser, he was so feared that he held sway not
only over life and death but also manipulation of rule
of law and effectively fostered the long-running
“culture of silence,” where Ghanaians were very afraid
to speak their minds for fear of being killed or
disappearing. An avowed Marxist-Socialist and former
guerrilla fighter in Angola, Kojo-T’s accusation of the
President John Kufour’s democratic regime of engaging
“in the manipulation of the judicial system” following
the conviction of Tsatsu, reveal the on-going difficult
attempts to grow democracy, the rule of law and free the
overburdened judiciary from the clutches of tribalism,
excessive emotions against sound reasoning, and
politicization.
As Kojo-T exemplifies, anytime any of the former ruling
PNDC/NDC members are indicted for any wrong doing, they
instantly read it as politically motivated despite
contrary behaviour (just compare their lifestyles before
they came to power and after). By rejecting the national
award on the allegation that the Kufour administration
has manipulated the jailing of his cousin Tsatsu, Kojo-T
opens the old wound between Ghana’s “democracy
constituency” and its “socialist constituency,” where
the likes of Kojo-T do not believe in the tenets of
democracy, despite some of their recent claims of
transforming themselves into social democrats, and with
the slightest mishap, throw juju into the democratic
process. In Kojo-T, the central issue isn’t his National
Order of the Volta award, of which he has the right to
reject or accept; the central issue is the wisdom of
being named as honouree for his security services to the
state – this is despite some serious grumbling in
certain quarters that Kojo-T doesn’t deserve any award
since he is alleged to have been engaged in
extra-judicial killings and disappearance of some
Ghanaians.
But in the name of reconciliation and healing such
accusations against Kojo-T become fertilizer to further
consolidate Ghana, and award Kojo-T a national honour
for his security services to a Ghana that has for a good
part of its 51-year corporate existence suffered bumps
of insecurities to the detriment of its progress. Still,
Kojo-T doesn’t need to reject the national award but
help his cousin Tsatsu appeal his conviction in a court
of law if he finds Tsatsu’s conviction unfair and deeply
belief in the rule of law and not any threatening,
tribalistic and emotional outburst. And it is in this
sense that the Chief Justice, Mrs. Georgina Theodora
Wood, advised Tsatsu to “seek redress in a court of
competent jurisdiction” to resolve his conviction.
The fact that Tsatsu has been jailed and not killed, as
had been the case during the good part of Kojo-T and
associates’ rule, doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be an
award for Kojo-T - despite Kojo-T’s emotional attempts
to blend the two. Tsatsu’s encounter with the law for
financial crimes is diametrically different from Kojo-T
being awarded national honour, whether they are from the
same family or ethnic group or political party. The law
is blind to all these differences, and is unwavering
with its application to wrong doing.
This is against Kojo-T’s PNDC/NDC rule where the rule of
law was turned upside down and some Ghanaians were
subject to extra-judicial threats, harassment, and
deaths including public executions.
Kofi Akosah-Sarpong, Canada, June
29, 2008
|