|
Economic Partnership Agreement: How
many Ghanaians know about it?
A GNA feature by Hannah Asomaning
Accra, Sept. 02, Ghanadot/GNA - At
a forum to discuss Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA)
between Europe and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP)
countries most of my colleague journalists asked what it was
all about.
"This assignment is boring," was a repetitive phrase from
most of them, an indication that they did not really know
what the EPA was all about.
The EPA is a document by the European Union advocating free
trade agreements with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP)
countries.
The content of this Agreement includes the proposal that the
ACP countries liberalize almost 90 per cent of all their
productive capacity, substantially covering all forms of
trade in which there are no duties on goods imported and
exported between the two groups.
The EPA is based on a principle of reciprocity.
But the big question is: "Can Africa, and for that matter
Ghana, compete with Europe?"
A number of people GNA spoke, including the educated working
class, had not heard about the EPA before or what it stood
for.
It was therefore in the right direction, when Mr Bernard
Mornah, National Youth Organizer of People's National
Convention (PNC), called for the involvement of the people
in the decision to sign the agreement scheduled for December
31, 2007.
He called for citizens' involvement and participation in
deciding the EPA with the argument that the negotiations
could not be limited to only heads of state and Ministers
since it was crucial and could affect the future of Ghana
and Africa as a whole.
An example currently is the effect on the agricultural
sector. Although Europe subsidizes her farmers, Ghana does
not do that.
What this means is that poultry produced in Ghana is likely
to be three times more expensive than imported frozen
chicken.
The poultry industry in Ghana has some serious challenges,
because the price of imported frozen chicken is far cheaper
than locally produced chicken and the Ghanaian farmer is at
a disadvantage.
This applies to other agricultural produce. There is an
ongoing campaign in the country to promote local rice
production and consumption, but it is not surprising that
many people prefer the imported rice. The reasons are that
the consumer erroneously thinks the quality of locally
produced rice is lower.
It is, however, not surprising that most Ghanaians do not
know about the EPA, let alone its implications.
But how is the ordinary Ghanaian supposed to know?
I did not know about the EPA until I had the opportunity to
join an NGO called "Dedederkamer" or the Third Chamber, a
Netherlands-based organization that advocates strengthened
political support for international cooperation and
sustainable development.
The real eye opening came when Ms Maria Martens, a Member of
Parliament in the European Parliament, made a statement that
African leaders did not have the capacity to negotiate with
their counterpart Europeans.
It may be true that African leaders do not have the capacity
to negotiate such things with their European counterparts,
but does it mean that Europe has the solution to Africa's
problems?
Is this EPA going to solve Africa's problem? Standards are
set by Europe, and Africa is supposed to follow, how do we
then trade with them as equal partners.
Can we agree with the Convention People's Party (CPP) that
the relationship between Africa and Europe under the guise
of EPA is one of the subtle forms of neo-colonialism?
"The commitment to negotiate a new agreement between the
African, Caribbean and Pacific countries (ACP) and the
European Union by December 31, 2007 must be understood as a
continuation of the classical relationship of a colonial
economy and its metropolitan patron," Mr Oteng Anane, Youth
Organizer of the Party said.
How prepared is Africa to safeguard its economy from
subsidized and cheap European goods flooding our markets?
Should the removal of trade barriers on more than 60 per
cent of trade between the EU and ACP be sealed, as EPA in
its current form posits, then it is likely that our local
industries, especially the agricultural sector, will
eventually collapse.
Mr Anane observed: "It will, in the long-run produce an
economy of young people with skills that do not meet the
challenges of the economic regime. In short, the nation will
find herself in an economic system that does not support her
own initiative."
The operations of the EU, he said, would not only
discriminate against Ghana and other African countries but
would also perpetuate the many artificial barriers, which
were imposed on Africa by the European colonial masters.
Referring to the Cotonou Agreement, the CPP Youth Organizer
noted that instead of contributing to regional integration,
the EPA sought to undermine regional integration.
Mr Anane called on the ACP negotiators, the government of
Ghana and the ECOWAS Secretariat to see the need for the EPA
to be youth specific and to be design to meet the countries'
youth development agenda or be informed on the possible
implications of the EPA on youth development.
"We prefer EPA covering 55 percent of all substantive trade
and 45 percent of sensitive products for the ACP countries.
This will provide sufficient flexibility for the ACP
countries..."
He said when the EPA was finally signed it could lead to
unfair competition and unemployment, resulting in worsening
poverty as well as substantial loss of revenue.
"With 20 percent tariff on poultry entering Ghana, Ghana's
poultry sector which provides about 80,000 jobs to Ghanaians
directly and 450,000 indirectly has been priced-out."
Dr. Dick Niezer, EU representative, however, defends the EPA
saying it is made in the best interest of Ghana, Africa and
future generations.
He explained that the EU had only given a proposal and was
waiting for the ACP to bring their own proposal so that the
two parties could come to a compromise.
How true is this? Isn't the EU in business with Africa? This
is a wake up call for Ghanaians to be interested in
development cooperation.
The decisions taken by the European Union at any point in
time go a long way to affect "you" as an individual and "us"
as a nation. How do we deal with this?
To quote Archbishop Charles Gabriel Palmer-Buckle,
Metropolitan Catholic Archbishop of Accra, the media must
exist to form, inform and transform.
Yes. But civil society also has a role to play in making
this a possibility. We cannot sit idle and let Europe form,
inform and transform Africa in their own way. Let's get
involved.
GNA
|
