SPONSORSHIP AD HERE  
 
Commentary
We invite commentaries from writers all over. The subject is about Ghana and the world. We reserve the right to accept or reject submissions, but we are not necessarily responsible for the opinions expressed in articles we publish.
.           Home

We invite responsible response to articles on our pages.  Response should not be less than 200 words. Write to: The Editor, editor@ghanadot.com

 
Bank of Ghana Daily Interbank FX Rates
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

MR SPEAKER, SIR, YOU HAVE UNILATERALLY ABOLISHED THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GHANA'S PARLIAMENT!
By Cameron Duodu

September 06, 2016

Perhaps I should not have been surprised when I heard that the Speaker of the National Assembly, The Right Honourable Doe Adjaho, had disallowed the Motion the Minority wanted to present to the House, asking it to investigate reports that President John Mahama had received a Chevrolet car as a “gift” from a Burkinabe contractor. The contractor subsequently obtained some contracts from the Government of Ghana, and so, the “gift” can be considered a “bribe”-- and in its oversight role, that's a proper issue fior Parliament to be concerned with.

I should not have been surprised at Adjaho's action because the Government of which he is a member (he was put in the job of Speaker of the Legislature by the Majority NDC, which is in power at the executive level as well as in the Legislature) is so notorious for flouting normal rules with impunity that it is almost naïve to expect it to do anything else.

Indeed, Mr Adjaho had set a precedent for himself in “impunity” by acting in precisely the same manner, over the sale of Merchant Bank to a company called Fortiz in 2014. He got away with that, thanks to the iability of the Opposition to demonstrate that he had flouted the Constitution in blocking the parliamentary scrutiny of a transaction that involved public funds, namely, capital taken from the Social Security and National Insurance Trust. How can one man impose his understanding of what the functions of Parliament are, on the elected representatives of the people? After all, was it not Parlaiemtnt that voted him in as its Speaker? How can the "servant" force his point of view upon his employer?

But even though in blocking Parliamentary scrutiny of the sale of Merchant Bank to Fortiz, Mr Adjaho acted ultra vires, (that is, he acted “beyond the powers of his office”) he at least had the fig leaf of the sub judice rule to cover his patently partisan act. (In fairness to the Opposition, they might have bowed to a rather narrow interpretation of the sub judice rule.)

A narrow interpretation of the sub judice rule? Yes -- it is a well-known stratagem for clever lawyers, to rush to file a writ in court, when they want to gag both the media (and in this case, even Parliament) on realising that embarrassing disclosures might ensue from an open, public and privileged discussion of a matter – especially one relating to a dubious business deal.

In the Mahama/Chevrolet car matter, however, no recoursethe issue is not even before a court! It is only before the Commission for Human Rights And Administrative Justice (CHRAJ). So, in preventing Parliament – which has so much power that a popular adage says it “can do anything except change a man into a woman!”) – Mr Adjaho has dealt two deadly blows to Ghana's 1992 Constitution: (1) he has unilaterally upgraded the status of the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice to full judicial status, in direct contravention to the Constitution and (2) he has thereby unilaterally abolished the power of the Parliament of Ghana given to it by the people of Ghana!The Opposition sasys it is "embarrassed". Well, it shouldn't be --Joe Adaho dseserves to be brought down for committing treason against the Parliament of Ghana, and thereby, against the peopleof Ghana.

For what he has done is totally unacceptable, because in the very first words of the Constitution, it is clearly stated that:
QUOTE: “The Sovereignty of Ghana resides in the people of Ghana in whose name and for whose welfare the powers of government are to be exercised in the manner and within the limits laid down in this Constitution.” UNQUOTE

In other words, SOVEREIGNTY RESIDES IN THE PEOPLE, AND THEREBY, THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES; i.e. PARLIAMENT!

Indeed, CHRAJ would be the first body to express shock at the way Mr Adjaho has used a CHRAJ investigation to block an investigation by our sovereign Parliament. For on its own webpage, the CHRAJ acknowledges unambiguously that:
QUOTE: The Commission is not a judicial body and cannot review decisions that have previously been decided by a competent court. UNQUOTE

So, if the CHRAJ does not consider itself either as a "judicial body" or a "competent court", where did Adjaho get the idea that a CHRAJ investigation can preclude Parliament from scrutinising any behaviour of a person holding public office? Who gave Mr Adjaho the power to clothe the proceedings of the CHRAJ with the mantle of sub judice? (By the way, as a matter of interest, the sub judice principle is, itself, under severe attack, on the grounds that it is antiquiated and that no modern judge worth his/her salt would take the slightest notice of anything said elsewhere about a case before him or her, when judges are enjoined to consider only evidence adduced before their courts.)

I have to remind Mr Doe Adjaho – again (as I did when I put him on my "New Year Honours List" in January 2015) – that the position of Speaker of the National Assembly is not one to be dignified only with “silk hoses and patent leather shoes” (the garb favoured by the Speaker of the House of Commons and adopted, to my knowkledge, by Speakers of the Parliament of Ghana, forllowing a precedent set by Sir Emmanuel Charles Quist!)

Despite the superficial frills, the position of Speaker is one of great trust. To be given the power to oversee the propriety of what is said and doner by the elected representatives of the people on behalf of their electors, is to be placed in charge of the most important right that any people can possess – freedom of speech. The Speaker must facilitate and protect this right, not impede it.

That is why, if I were an MP, I would go straight to the Supreme Court to seek an interpretation of the notion that if the CHRAJ is seized of a matter, then Parliament is automatically prevented from delving into it. Indeed, if we were in a country where people cared enough about their constitutional rights, a public appeal would be launched immediately asking for donations to finance a suit at the Supreme Court to declare the Speaker's assault on democracy unlawful.

May I point Mr Adjaho (and the Clerk of Parliament, whose technocratic name Mr Adjaho ingloriously invoked in making his outrageous and scandalous ruling) to what the website of the House of Commons – the location from which the mystifying notion of a “Speaker” who does not “speak” in debates originated (!) – has to say about the office of the Speaker:

QUOTE: “The Speaker is the chief officer and highest authority of the House of Commons and must remain politically impartial at all times. [emphasis added]....The Speaker keeps order and calls MPs to speak. Speakers still stand in general elections. [But] They are generally unopposed by the major political parties, who will not field a candidate in the Speaker's constituency. [emphasis added]. During a general election, Speakers do not campaign on any political issues [emphasis added]. UNQUOTE

It is the enforcement of rules like the above that enables the British to have confidence in the integrity of their high officials. Even so, they are not fully satisfied with their democracy, and keep tinkering with it.


If our democracy is to last; if it is to be respected by the populace as a system that can effectively prevent corruption from occuring in our nations's affairs; then we must force our public office-holders to exhibit the same integrity


as their British counterparts do. And we can only do that if we ensure that officials like the Speaker of Parliament understand and operate our system, both according to the words written in the Constitution and the spirit behind those fine words.

In other words, Mr Speaker, we don't call you 'Panin' (Elder) for nothing (as our talking drums would tell you, if you knew how to listen to them!). You are supposed to repay the privileges inherent in your position, by acting in a manner that would not disgrace your counterparts in other democratic domains. For, after doing what you have done, how can you -- and your Clerk -- hold your heads high, if you are invited to conferences of the Inter-Parliamentary organisations of the democratic world?
--
www.cameronduodu.com




 

 

 

Google
 
Web www.ghanadot.com

 

The Munitie3 pardon misses a larger point
Commentary, Aug 29, Ghanadot - Clearly, the Muntie3 argument is not about the President’s constitutional right to pardon. Constitutionally, the president can pardon a loaf of bread. The problem for him would be to explain the optic and the ethics of the pardon.

 

 

Can Ghana stop its borrowing binge?
AfricaReport, Aug 30, Ghanadot - The government has announced its intention to issue a $1bn eurobond by September, but keeps on equivocating about following through. The economy has been going through rough times since 2012, when the currency nosedived amidst power cuts and a huge government deficit......
More

   

Democracy and accountability under attack in today’s Ghana

Commentary, June 07, Ghanadot - We have got to be better than this. By 2008 we had the distinction of being a country with one of the highest indices of press freedom in the world. Today, we are discussing the possibility of social media being blocked for the upcoming elections. Is this real? We are falling into the embrace of Uganda, Congo Brazzaville and God forsaken Chad? Do we have a constitution that guarantees universal freedom of expression or don't we? ....More

  Zika outbreak fuelled by mosquito control failure, says WHO boss
BBC, May 24, Ghanadot - The spread of Zika is the price being paid for a massive policy failure on mosquito control, says World Health Organization leader Margaret Chan......More
   
 

ABC, Australia
FOXNews.com
The EastAfrican, Kenya
African News Dimensions
Chicago Sun Times
The Economist
Reuters World
CNN.com - World News

All Africa Newswire
Google News
The Guardian, UK
Africa Daily
IRIN Africa
The UN News
Daily Telegraph, UK
Daily Nation, East Africa

BBC Africa News, UK
Legal Brief Africa
The Washington Post

Daily Mail, UK
BusinessInAfrica
Mail & Guardian, S. Africa
The Washington Times
ProfileAfrica.com
Voice of America

Business & Financial Times

CBSnews.com
New York Times
Vanguard, Nigeria
Christian Science Monitor
News24.com
Yahoo/Agence France Presse

 
  SPONSORSHIP AD HERE  
 
   

Announcements
Debate
Commentary
Ghanaian Papers
Health
Market Place
News
Official Sites
Pan-African Page
Personalities
Reviews
Social Scene
Sports

 
   

Currency Converter
Educational Opportunities
Job Opening
FYI

 
 
Send This Page To A Friend: