Obama and the "Russians Did
January 23, 2017
The first black president,
Barrack Obama, left office on January 20, 2017 amidst a nice
time honored ceremony, except for the acts of some protesters
that sought to mar the occasion.
The rationale behind
the most visible protest, the John Lewis and the 68 House
representatives, was that Russia had helped elect Donald Trump,
therefore “his presidency is illegitimate.”
worth discussing is how 'The Russians Did It,"
that, true or not, may alter Obama's legacy too for reasons that may not seem
How this matter may alter Obama's legacy is a matter worth discussing.
Whether Obama policies are successful or not is not the issue
here. It is about him being the first Black African-American president and how this singular Russian charge impacts the reputation of his presidency.
Already, the charge has had some impact. It has ruined the
transition to Trump. How deep the damage goes to touch on
the racial nerve from now on will depend on how soon
another Black American follows Obama into the same office.
Democrats and liberals are milking “The Russian Did
it" theme because it lends benefit to future campaigns.
In Obama, Democrats found the perfect vehicle. And as always
as they have done in the past to other black leaders, they
will move on; once these
leaders are used up.
(Harold Lee Washington, Mayor, Chicago 1983; David Norman
Dinkins, New York City, 1990 come to mind.)
And so, the Russian charge will remain for generations to
come until some meaning is derived out of this emotional tag.
trouble for Obama in 2009, at the very moment he accepted the
Nobel Peace Award.
The award was unusual. It
could have been received on behalf of the Civil
Rights movement. But it went solely to Obama on the basis
of expectation and not accomplishment.
Note the official reason for the
Award in general, ".. to the person who shall have done the
most or the best work for fraternity between nations, the
abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding
and promotion of peace congresses."
For a powerful world leader to
accept a peace prize that early in office and on the basis of
"hope and expectations" would raise suspicion
of a move
to shape his future actions.
Furthermore, looking at the
idea of the award from the
racial perspective and on the same basis as given to such a
newly minted super power black leader, one might not help think
And true enough, the premature award, to some extent, helped shape parts of
Obama policy initiatives and made him to look more pacific.
Until the 2016 election
the Democrats were defeated and the Russians were charged.
Obama then became more aggressive, based on findings from the intelligence
agencies against the Russians, which many agreed were highly probable but not certain.
But, no matter, Obama had found his cause.
True or not,
the charge meant it was the first time in US history
a selection of a president was decided by outside
interference, precisely speaking, by the Russians.
notion of the Russians as villains has now been firmly inserted into the minds of the
American public. And relation with Russia plummeted.
Also left in the public mind is a dark
question; could it only have happened on Obama the
peacemaker's watch, this serious feat against America?
The answer may turn out to be malignant and as negative a narrative
on Obama as Bush's “Mission Accomplished” message on Iraq was in
Additionally, the charge in a way has diminished the look of
America, the giant, in the eyes of some in the world.
No thoughtful admirer of Obama should allow the
Russian charge to stand for the above reasons.
But the charge is being promoted
by liberals and Democrats to obscure the fact that their
candidate Hillary was a very flawed politician.
And it has brought a worsening in relationship between America
and Russia; the worst since the end
of the cold war.
America has not been so low in political intelligence esteem against Russia since President Kennedy and the Cuban
crisis. She always came up on top in little or big PR
skirmishes until now..
Nixon had a
“Detente” with the Russians, the magnitude of which is still
felt in the history books today.
tear down this wall” moment in 1987 is still ringing nostalgic
in the ears of Americans.
All through the years of Bush, Sr
and Clinton through Bush, Jr, the Russians were kept quiet on the
Even so, Obama and
Hillary thought then that the Russian/American relationship was at its
worst peak. After Bush left office and Obama came, they promised improvement.
Hillary then took a mock "reset" button to the Russians.
Unknown to Hillary as she
handed over the mock button, the inscription of “reset” in
Russian on the
button was wrong. It had been translated as “overcharge” instead.
The Russian Foreign Minister Sergai
Lavrov corrected the mistake as he was accepting the mock
Perhaps, that mock "reset" moment in 2009 should have warned
Americans about the handling of Russian affairs. The relationship with Russia is
now far worse than when Obama and
Hillary took office, made worst with the charge the Russians were responsible for Trump's victory.
There is a vast irony in the charge. It is
in what the Democrats are willing to hide in preference to the
damage they are causing to the legacy of a black
presidency, in terms of optics.
Truth is, it is not so much the Russians. The Democrats simply
chose to coronate the wrong woman. Yes, the first to come
close to being a
The hurt became palpable with each cry of “Trump is illegitimate president”.
time this year, sixty-eight House Democrats
have bought the idea of the "illegal president" and were busy working the stain into the electoral grain by refusing
to attend the inaugural.
In the lead of this group was
Representative John Lewis, a Civil Rights icon, who in this
respect, baffled many with his stance on the issue.
one ought to have asked Representative Lewis at this stage was,
with the possible damage to Obama's reputation looming, what was
he doing grand standing on a charge that might stain Obama's
becoming the president was the height of achievement for the Civil Rights movement
and black pride. Representative Lewis could have done better.
Instead he chose to boycott the inauguration on a supposed
principle. He added that it was his first boycott.
He was soon contradicted. Apparently, it wasn't his first boycott of an inaugural. He had
already established a tradition of boycotting Republicans.
Lewis boycotted George Bush's inaugural in 2001.
In between George Bush and Trump, Lewis had disparaged
former Republican presidential contestants, John McCain and Milt
Romney, by equating each to George Wallace of Alabama, the
Clearly, it was a
partisan John Lewis in action; not the moral principled act of a
Rights leader in operation.
No surprise here. For 30 years plus, Lewis has been on the Democrat side.
Trump is “illegitimate” may be a good
strategy for the Democrats cause but may not necessary be good
policy for defending what black pride has achieved.
For, there is no joy in knowing that it could be possible for
someone to declare for the history books
that Russia was able to attain the intelligence coup only
because our Black leader was in charge.
elected the first black American president; not White, Hispanic,
Asian, a woman or any other person from the diversity group.
And with that we made history.
The notion that the Russians gained
huge influence on America's electoral system on Obama's watch
is already defiling the historic prestige gained with his election.
History may still remember Obama with fondness for being the
first African-American president. Many a racist's conscience will
be salved for having helped a Black ascend to the presidency.
But the same
racists will end up saying it was only because of Obama that the Russians were able to win this time.
Ablorh-Odjidja,Publisher www.ghanadot.com, Washington, DC,
January 23, 201.
Permission to publish: Please feel free to
publish or reproduce, with credits, unedited. If posted at a
website, email a copy of the web page to email@example.com
. Or don't publish at all.