|
Awakening the Sleeping Ghana via
its Elites
By Kofi Akosah-Sarpong
Maxwell Owusu, a professor of anthropology at the
University of Michigan, thinks Ghana is asleep as a
development project. The issue borders on how Ghanaian
elites understand their nation-state to the extent of
how they exploit such understanding to the global
prosperity level for progress. For Owusu, as the
Accra-based Public Agenda reports, Ghana’s
near-development-coma has been going on “for the best
part of her history.”
This is disturbing for a Ghana that pride itself as the
“Black Star of Africa” and that should have translated
into remarkable progress in development philosophy, an
“African Way,” driven foremost from within its cultural
values unto the Africa development terrain. But, if
Owusu’s views are anything to go by, then Ghana has been
more of Pan-Africanism “media star” without gist.
And for Owusu, Ghana’s
development weaknesses for the past 51 years has seen
the “Black Star of Africa” among the 35 poorest nations
in the world. Ghana’s centers of development are far,
far behind others. As Owusu noted, it doesn’t matter
whether military or civilian governments, the thinking
have been the same. For, if “Ghana has lost its focus”
and “sleeping,” then by all descriptions that depicts
its elites thinking, as directors of progress.
Owusu says in the 1950s Ghana was leading many African
and Asian countries in development but today they are
all ahead of Ghana: once again, centers of development
are far, far behind the Asians. In his exasperation,
Owusu exclaims, "Good God, what is happening to Ghana?”
The fact is what is happening to Ghana is what is
happening in its elites' minds. As much as it might
sound worrying the African or Asian countries that are
ahead of Ghana today have transformative elites who have
confidence (and that enhance their psychology) in their
cultural values in relation to the global prosperity
principles and they are able to think from within their
values to the global development ideals. In Africa,
Botswana stands out.
In Asia, bold thinking by their elites from within their
culture in the face of grim developmental challenges
transformed into their progress and saw the hatching of
the “Asian Way” development philosophy. Whether in
Malaysia’s Mahathir Mohamad, Japan’s Akio Morita, South
Korea’s Gen. Park Chung Hee, Taiwan’s Gen. Chiang
Kai-shek, Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew or China’s Deng
Xiaoping, Southeast Asian transformative elites had
outstanding grasp of their cultural values and were able
to weave them into the global prosperity ideals.
Predictably, though there were some rifts between the
Southeast Asian indigenous tradition and the dominant
Western neo-liberal ideals in Asia’s march to
prosperity, since 1949, as Daniel Yergin and Joseph
Stanislaw argue in The Commanding Height, “the Asian
miracle is now sometimes called “Confucian capitalism,”
a reminder of their elites’ ability to blend their
cultural values and the neo-liberal development
paradigms. The outcome, as Robert Kagan argues in The
Return of History and the End of Dreams, is an “Asian
arc of freedom and prosperity” stretching from Japan to
Indonesia to India.
Owusu’s comparison of Ghana to the Asian nations can
also be seen in the recent G8 summit in Japan. As
members of the G8 found out to their awakening in their
June summit in Hokkaido, Japan, argues Phillipe Pons of
Le Monde, despite being forged by 18th century European
thinkers, Asian nations have created a unique
development system based on their cultural values and
“not necessarily “western” …When concepts have been
borrowed, they have been mixed with local ingredients
and redesigned to take new forms.” In China, for
instance, as Pons cited Eamonn Fingleton, of the London,
UK-based Financial Times, as explaining in In the Jaws
of the Dragon, its elites borrow anything appropriate
from Western neo-liberal development ideals and blend it
with theirs.
In this context, Owusu relates how the Asians, who had
been as poor as Africans today, appropriating from among
their cultural attributes, “have an ancient culture
based on the technology of intellect” and “that
knowledge is at the very centre of their consciousness.”
Why Ghanaian elites have not been able to do same openly
and critically for the past 51 years reveals elites who
do not know and understand themselves, as the Greek
thinker Plato would say, or are ashamed of their
culture, and for this reason, have been circling
hopelessly around the world like a headless chicken in
their development process as if they have no innate
values, as if they have nothing original to drive their
progress.
No doubt, as Y.K. Amoakoh, former chair of the UN
Economic Commission for Africa, says, Ghana/Africa is
the only region in the world where its development
process is dominated by foreign development paradigms to
the disadvantage of its rich cultural values. That tells
how African elites are not only “sleeping” but also the
nature of their degree of thinking in relation to the
continent’s progress.
Owusu, in this sense, thinks Ghanaians (more its elites)
are ignorant, more seriously of themselves and their
cultural values in relation to their progress.
"Ignorance does not only mean the lack of education but
the lack of a particular knowledge." And that
“particular knowledge” to drive Ghana’s progress and
awaken its development process is how its elites will be
able to think from within its cultural values to the
global development ideals. Short of that “Ghana has
indeed been sleeping for the best part of her history.”
Kofi Akosah-Sarpong, Canada,
August 24, 2008
|