|
Rural Reporting, Progress and the
Culture
By Kofi Akosah-Sarpong, Ghanadot
For a good part of its 50-year existence Ghana hasn’t
understood and known itself, as the Greek thinker Plato
would have said, the confusion pretty much emanating
from its contact with the colonialists and its elites’
inability to undo the confusion. Ghana’s national
development policies have been heavily informed by its
ex-colonial paradigms than its innate ones, to the
extent that most Ghanaians have little or no trust,
faith and confidence in their foundational traditional
values for their progress, making many a Ghanaian
intellectual think from foreign values when dealing with
authentic Ghanaian problems.
But gradually, as the atmosphere increasingly gets
better - democratically, intellectually and morally -
through the growing convictions, Ghana is gradually
understanding and knowing itself. The metaphysics of the
development process has changed. That’s why the
Accra-based “Ghanaian Times” is expanding its editorial
policy to include broader rural reporting, which will
enable it deal more critically with disconcerting
cultural issues.
The Ghanaian culture, for long suppressed, is gradually
coming into the forefront of national development. The
education curriculum is being balanced by inserting
Ghanaian/African traditional values and sensibilities.
There are fervent calls nationally for one indigenous
language as a national language in addition to the
English language. There have emerged thinkers such as
Mr. Sampson Boafo, Mr. Courage Quashigah, Mr. Bernard
Guri and Mr. Kofi Akosah-Sarpong who argue for not only
the appropriation of Ghanaian values for progress
through policy-making and bureaucratization but also in
doing so refine the inhibitions within them. The
trailblazing Culture and Chieftaincy Ministry, driven by
sector Minister Mr. Sampson Boafo, is actively
everywhere, enlightening, activating, and opening up the
culture for progress, encouraging traditional rulers to
get involve in the progress of their communities, and
calling on all Ghanaians to help eradicate the
inhibitions within their culture. Certain deforming
cultural values such as female genital mutilation have
been criminalized by the Parliament of Ghana.
The increasingly educated traditional rulers and their
institutions are being challenged to purify itself,
minimize its chronic disputes, get involve in
development, and participate in national discourse by
looking into their cultures not only to help refine its
inhibitions but also promote its good aspects. A Royal
College of Chiefs is on the table to bring traditional
rulers openly into the development process. Some
international development organizations such as Canada’s
World University Service, involved in child-girl
education, are helping. The mass media is critically
dealing with cultural issues, with the mass circulation
“The Ghanaian Times” re-orientating its editorial
policies to focus more on rural reporting as a way of
opening up not only the rural areas, where majority of
Ghanaians live, but also the culture for progress.
With the development atmosphere under intense scrutiny,
especially rural and cultural issues fully getting
dramatic national attention, Mr. Kofi Asuman, Managing
Director of the daily "Ghanaian Times," indicated a
shift in editorial paradigm by giving ample coverage to
rural reporting. The strategy is to “bring out the real
issues and challenges impeding the development of rural
communities to public and government attention.” By
focusing on rural issues, the “Ghanaian Times” will be
able to deal face-to-face with most of the cultural
challenges that have endured for very long time because
of long-running neglect by the Ghanaian media. Heavily
urban based, the Ghanaian media’s coverage of rural
areas are very low compared to the urban areas, for
obvious power and financial reasons, despite the fact
that most Ghanaians live in the rural areas and despite
the fact that all the good things Ghanaian flow from the
rural areas to the urban areas, as the Greek thinker
Pericles (ca. 495–429 BC) would say.
By stating the new “Ghanaian Times” editorial policy in
Upper West Regional, one of three regions in northern
Ghana that are the poorest and the Ghana-wide views
being held that certain aspects of their culture are
inimical to their progress, the “Ghanaian Times’”
intended rural reporting will help open up the northern
regions, which are heavily rural, for deeper
developmental inquiry, especially the cultural
inhibitions that have been troubling their progress.
Already, Mr. Alhassan Samari, the Upper East Regional
Minister, perhaps speaking for the three northern
regions, has stated that, “Certain outmoded and negative
cultural practices are too dehumanizing to the people.
Human beings cannot be treated like a beast. With
civilization, we need to move forward…Our revered chiefs
are please requested to take these kind suggestions as a
challenge and explore proactive means to get rid of our
society of these rather outmoded cultural practices that
seek to draw back our clock of development.”
The “Ghanaian Times” rural reporting will be one of the
antidote to Mr. Samari and his folks’ developmental
troubles – the problems will be analytically made
public, and, in doing so not only throw them up for
national discussions but enable either the government or
some non-governmental organizations attempt to solve the
problem. Broadly, it will give a peek into how District
Assemblies and the Regional Coordinating Councils
understand and know their immediate environment and how
they are attempting to handle such debilitating
developmental challenges as stated by Mr. Samari. By
openly declaring its interest to spotlight on rural
issues, the “Ghanaian Times,” moved by conviction more
than monetary gains, will be correcting many an
historical and material errors that ignored crucial
rural development issues including the deforming
cultural inhibitions that undermine progress.
By expanding its editorial perspectives to rural
reporting, the “Ghanaian Times” joins the growing number
of Ghanaian media houses, elites, thinkers, ethnic
associations, institutions, non-governmental
organizations, the Culture and Chieftaincy Ministry,
religious organizations, and international development
agencies attempting to engage not only rural development
challenges but also comprehensively deal with certain
abnormalities within the Ghanaian culture that have been
deflating progress.
Kofi Akosah-Sarpong,
Canada, September 13, 2007
|