|
Boakye Djan and Doom Mongering
By Kofi Akosah-Sarpong
For some time, Major (rtd) Boakye Djan has been on the
media circuit verbalizing on myriad of national issues.
As the former spokesperson for the erstwhile Armed
Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC), which ruled Ghana
for almost six months, Djan thinks he has the moral
authority to give his piece of mind about some twisted
Ghanaian affairs. Either Djan is attempting to analyze
the irrationalities in Ghana’s nascent democracy or he
sees the on-going row between President John Kufour and
his ex-National Security Minister “as a recipe for
interventions” and warns of “coups have been happening
on the back of national crisis.”
You don’t need to be psychoanalyst to read Djan’s mind
and what informs his often chilling analysis of Ghanaian
national affairs. In fact President Kufour has
indirectly described Djan as “doom monger.” Djan has
been part of the most violent era of Ghana’s history –
in 1979 (June to September) junior officers, including
Djan as one of the senior officers, staged an “uprising”
and later “military housecleaning” that saw the
consequent executions of former military junta Heads of
State - Gen. Akwasi Afrifa of the National Liberation
Council; Gen. Kutu Acheampong and some of his associates
of the National Redemption Council; and Gen. F. W.
Akuffo and other leading members of the Supreme Military
Council.
Either as public therapy or moral cleansing or “house
cleaning,” Djan and his associates set to re-order a
disordered Ghana. In spate of events that indicated the
ruling elites have not learned their rough lessons
properly, series of political in-fighting, immaturity,
misguided actions, coups, counter-coups and vicious
events occurred, seeing Ft. Lt. Jerry Rawlings
effectively emerging and ruling Ghana for almost 20
years. Afraid of threat to his life, Djan, a former
journalist, escaped to the United Kingdom for a long,
lonely exile. In London, he had tried variously to
topple Rawlings but didn’t succeed.
That was then. Now there is democracy for the past 16
years. The emerging democracy enabled Djan to return
from his self-imposed exile. The democratic atmosphere
has also allowed Djan to discuss various national issues
without fear, appropriating some of the democratic
institutions and values such as the media and the rule
of law. Despite his big talks of being a democrat,
Ghanaians are yet to see any clear cut democratic
characteristics from Djan. But either Djan doesn’t
understand the nitty-gritty of democratic practices or
he is possessed with some dark forces - any row or
disagreements or schisms that crop up as part of the
democratic growth Djan interpret in a dark, chilling or
doom manner, as if the end of Ghana is about occur soon.
Hear Djan on President Kufour’s sacking of his National
Security Minister, Francis Poku, as reported by
myjoyonline.com, the “situation was a recipe for
interventions…coups have been happening on the back of
national crisis…The situation is preparing grounds for
intervention so the situation should be handled with
care.”
If politics or professionalism is anything to go by, why
should a President Kufour, who has the constitutional
powers to fire and hire his Ministers, not have the
power to hire and fire a Francis Poku any time he wants.
And the more telling aspects of all these nonsense is
that President Kufour is perhaps the most level-headed
or balanced person to rule Ghana. In the first place,
there shouldn’t be any noise or cry or “I will go the
press” by Poku. Since becoming President for the past
seven years, Kufour has hired and fired some people, and
none of them made any juvenile or immature cry or “I
will go the press” as Poku has been making. It is this
aspects of the Poku sacking that Djan should have
discussed in a matured and intellectually objective
manner so as to educate the Ghanaian youth – that Poku
can be hired and fired, period – instead of “situation”
being “a recipe for interventions…coups have been
happening on the back of national crisis…The situation
is preparing grounds for intervention so the situation
should be handled with care.”
With 21 years of military rule out of its 50 years of
corporate existence, Djan is so gripped with the dark
recesses of Ghana’s history and his own demons part of
which has come about because of his violent experiences
in the Ghanaian political scene that he does not either
see the bright side or the objective part of Ghana,
particularly the fact that democracies everywhere have
their moments of misunderstanding or acrimony or
rupture. A few months ago, there were violent fights in
the Indian National Parliament and the South Korean
Parliament. In Japan, some Ministers caught in
corruption scandals have committed suicide. In the
United States, Congress and the Bush White House have
had sustained acrimony and disagreements over many
national issues, some bordering on very serious national
security. And when this happens it doesn’t mean the
“situation was a recipe for interventions…coups have
been happening on the back of national crisis…The
situation is preparing grounds for intervention so the
situation should be handled with care.”
Still, after the successful convening of the ruling
National Patriotic Party congress that elected former
Foreign Minister, Nana Akufo-Addo, as the party’s
presidential candidate, Djan viewed that whole exercise
as so mired in money that he stated that “Ghana’s
political party democracy is irrational and needs a
revolution of ideas to address the potential for
instability that it could create for the country.” The
irrationality emanating from Ghana’s democracy is as a
result of the fact that Ghana’s democracy is infant –
even the so-called advanced democracies often show
irrationality, as Djan might have seen in his long years
in the United Kingdom. At 60-something years old, his
long global exposure, his university education, and his
involvement in a violent military junta, Djan, over the
years, have not demonstrated any remarkably fresh ideas
to fertilize Ghana’s democracy and development process.
While it is difficult to ignore what Djan is saying –
that “As a former national security operative and user
of national security products in government, the
developments give me a cause for grave concern” –
Ghana’s emerging democracy, like all struggling
democracies globally, should have a way of resolving its
disagreements or to use Djan’s favourite word,
“irrationalities,” without the situation being “a recipe
for interventions…coups have been happening on the back
of national crisis…The situation is preparing grounds
for intervention so the situation should be handled with
care.”
Kofi Akosah-Sarpong, Canada,
January 21, 2008
|