Response to
Curtailing the excuses
Dear Editor
E. Ablorh-Odjidja’s favorite peeve is the phrase
"You must come home to help".
He then asks "You must come home to do what?
The response is - To do the things that you
complain are not being done.
Referring to those who came back and failed to
make progress - "They turned back,
disillusioned, because whatever they thought
they could have achieved never came to
fruition".
Exactly, so it is not so easy to accomplish what
you thought should be done.
He says the beautiful ones have been born. They
are here and ready to regenerate the country -
“But would you allow them?"
I would respond
that even governments have been changed by civil
action in other parts of the world. Freedom is
never granted on a silver platter. Nobody is
going to give up his or her privileges just
because someone else could do a better job. In
places where people resign "voluntarily", they
do so because they know that if they don't they
will be pushed out. It is not because they are
innately more honorable.
Ablorh-Odjidja writes that remittances from
Ghanaians abroad are " unearned by any input of
labor or toil from Ghana". Really? I would point
out that the majority of Ghanaian doctors abroad
received highly subsidised education from
kindergarten to medical school in Ghana, and the
same applies to many other professionals. No
doubt the remittances are welcome and some of it
is used productively, such as paying medical
bills, school fees et cetera. Unfortunately, a
lot of these monies are used to fund buildings
that are not completed, purchase of large
impractical old cars or lavish parties and
funerals.
He says “The good I am already doing from
outside versus the good I could do from inside,
barring some "honorable" being in the way.” I
would respond that high-level education is
supposed to help people solve problems. So if
the problem is that something or someone is in
the way, then I would suggest that the
appropriate response is to find a way to get
round or through them. I don't think one should
respond by going to another country and
complaining from there. After all, "What is the
use of your education, if you do not come to the
aid of your country in her hour of need?" (Osagyefo
Dr Kwame Nkrumah, 1948) Talking about Nkrumah,
you will remember that, after he was invited, he
had to fight to achieve his objectives. He
wasn’t allowed to use the existing structures (UGCC),
so he had to create his own. Few Ghanaians are
as talented as he was but most can try to
emulate on a smaller scale. How much remittance
could Nkrumah have sent to match what he did
when he came down?
There are a few people who can do more from
outside than inside. International-standard
footballers, for example, are in that category,
if they choose to spend some of their earnings
here. However, a teacher or doctor, to name just
two examples, will provide far more value by
working here than by sending remittances. The
advantage of going abroad is that the individual
earns more money for himself and his immediate
family, but the country is generally worse off,
especially if the emigrant was born and bred
here.
In early adulthood, Ghanaian young men and women
have to make a decision whether to live in Ghana
or go abroad – on the basis of what they think
would best serve their interests. Those who stay
and establish themselves in their fields are not
going to voluntarily relinquish their gains to
colleagues who return years later.
However, returnees need never become "deadwood'.
With the cushion of their financial reserves,
they should be able to "behave better", go
against the grain and brighten their corner, big
or small.
So, please, less talk and more action.
“Revolutions are brought about by men, by men
who think as men of action and act as men of
thought.” Kwame Nkrumah.
Nii Adziri Sackey
Osu, Accra.
28th May 2015
Writer's
response:
I didn't talk.
I wrote, I am a writer. Not a doctor. Not
a footballer. It is the privilege of my
trade to write from anywhere.
"So, please, less
talk and more action." and you, Nii Adziri
Sackey, have to write?
By the way, have
you talked to the doctors and teachers who
returned and are still working here? Do you want
to make things a little better for them so that
they can be more productive; not waste away huge
portions of their talent and skills?
Just asking. You seem to have found the answer.
Or better still,
tell us how, you the man of action, did it.
We need to learn from your experience.
Thanks for the response to the article.
Cheers,
Ablorh
|