The idea of Obama not being ready
has been bandied about, even among Blacks who for some unstated
reason would not like to see him as president now. Some, like
BET founder Robert Johnson, have thrown their weight behind
Hillary.
Is Obama not ready because he is
Black, like Jackie Robinson versus Major League Baseball; or
that America, still a racist nation, will like to hide behind
the excuse of Obama lacking experience?
Graves, exploring this myth about
the experience further, brought in another named contender in
the primaries - John
Edwards, a White male aspirant of Democrat rank.
And Graves didn’t “put much stock
in the value of their experiences ( of both Clinton and
Edwards). Claims to an edge over Obama in this area are
exaggerated.” Clinton and Edwards, he concluded, “never held a
national office before 1999 and 2000, respectively.”
Presumably, the notion of
“experience” with Hillary in the background, could become a code
word – Blacks need not apply!
Luckily for the Democrats, no
Black is contending for the presidency on the Republican side to
muddle the issue. But needless to say, the Democrat party is
where all the Black vote is and so is the first place to settle
this racial preference argument.
A January 2008 poll, conducted by
Washington Post and ABC News, indicated that Blacks nationwide
supported Barack Obama 2 -1 over Hillary Clinton.
The current indication from the
Black community is a majority preference for Obama, in contrast
to the sentiment of the Democrat party machine.
The party machine needs to listen to its most loyal
group. But would it?
It becomes more interesting when
you consider the campaign theme from all three Democrat front
runners – CHANGE! They all want change. The reality is the
dialectics of this CHANGE should favor Obama.
If you would acknowledge that the
presidency has so far been a White bastion, then a Black
presidency next should be the change.
Gender is not the issue here.
Hillary Clinton, as a White woman, is part of the White bastion
just as Condi Rice, a Black woman, has been part of the
disadvantaged in America.
Change, therefore, should be
something more akin and drastic. A claim that says “I represent
change because I oppose George Bush” will not be enough for the
cry for radical CHANGE that has risen because of Obama's
presence. A change
from the George Bush personality only would rather be a very
superficial one.
Similarly, an agenda that says
America has to “change course because the rest of the world
hates America” can be childlike in its reasoning and a complete
falsehood.
The world doesn't hate America
because of George Bush. Even without him, the world would still
hate America the super-power as the less powerful have
historically reacted to all super-powers.
Edward and Hillary, who tout the
change from George Bush most, in actuality form part of the
privileged status quo as does Bush.
A change to favor any of these two would be the same old
story.
But change sometimes comes in
quaint ways. And
there is one in this race for the American presidency.
Should Hilary win this race Bill
Clinton, the former president of the U.S and her husband, will
now be the first gentleman. This will be a change to favor a
Clinton dynasty.
Bill’s role in his wife's
campaign is already defined.
He is the chief supporter, co-candidate, and the primary
attack dog in the race.
No former president has taken on this role in recent
history.
Rather, than Bill carrying on in
retirement with decorum as befits a former president, he is out
on the hustings, jousting it out with the campaign crowd,
debating and making the office of the ex-presidency more common,
all in the sole interest of getting his wife and him back to the
White House, a place they left barely a decade ago.
And should they win, the office
of the presidency itself will change: For the first, it would be
run as an open co-presidency by husband and wide. The saga of
Juan and Eva Peron of Argentina comes to mind. “Don’t cry for
me, America.”
Graves states in his concluding
paragraph that what an Obama presidency has to offer “is what
our nation needs at this critical place and time in our
history….The question is not whether America is ready to elect a
Black man as president. It is whether America will elect the
candidate best qualified to lead our country and restore our
global standing…..”
Sorry, Mr. Graves, the abilities
of America’s presidency are eventually defined by its global
superpower status.
The predilections of this power status may have to continue
under Obama as they were under Bush.
What we as Blacks must want from Obama’s presidency is an
outcome that ennobles us. Anything short will not look like
Jackie Robinson's in the Major League Baseball game.
With the baseball metaphor,
should Obama be elected, his hits and home runs would be about
his decisions and interventions in both the domestic and
superpower global spheres. Hopefully, these decisions would
notch upward America’s prestige worldwide while also advancing
the Black pride, in the manner Robinson did for America.
E. Ablorh-Odjidja, Publisher
www.ghanadot.com, Washington, DC, January 19, 2008.
Permission to publish: Please
feel free to publish or reproduce, with credits, unedited. If
posted on a website, email a copy of the web page to
publisher@ghanadot.com. Or don't publish at all.